Home
Page
Search
Final
Report
Interim
Report
- The Report
- Annex A
- Annex B
Evidence
Inquiry
Seminars
About
the Inquiry
Help
|
|
Contents > Letter to the Chief
Medical Officer for England
<< Previous |
Next >>
Interim Report: Removal and retention of human material
Letter to the Chief Medical Officer for England
To: Chief Medical Officer for England
May 2000
Dear Professor Donaldson,
- We promised to let you have an Interim Report by the late spring.
We hope that it will assist you in your investigation into these matters.
- This Interim Report arises from the BRI Inquiry into paediatric cardiac
surgical services. It focuses on parents and their children.
- The Report deals with the removal, retention, use and disposal of
human material after post-mortems. We use the term 'human material':
'tissue' and 'organs' are the words usually used but they are unclear
and confusing.
- The great majority of post-mortems are Coroners' post-mortems: their
purpose is to determine the cause of death.
- Coroners' post-mortems are carried out by pathologists who, in the
past, have considered that they were entitled to retain, long-term,
human material such as organs (for example hearts) for teaching, research
and storage in archives.
- Parents, particularly those of children who have died in hospital,
have been shocked. They were almost entirely unaware of this practice
by pathologists. In fact, over the past 20 years or so a high proportion
of children's hearts have been retained in collections, almost always
without the parents' knowledge.
- Human material has also been removed and kept after hospital post-mortems.
Parents in the past have often agreed to these post-mortems but without
any real understanding of what was involved.
- The law regulating the removal, retention, use and disposal of human
material is obscure, uncertain and arcane.
- We identify two ways forward. The first, which we see as essential,
is a new Code of Practice backed with appropriate enforcement mechanisms.
This does not require passing new law: it simply supplements the existing
law. The second option, which is desirable but not essential, involves
changes in the law, together with the incorporation into law of the
proposed Code of Practice.
- In making any changes we identify two fundamental guiding principles:
first and foremost, respect for parents and their dead child; second
the value of continued access to human material for the advancement
of medical care and treatment.
- We commend this Interim Report to you.
Ian Kennedy (Chairman)
Rebecca Howard
Brian Jarman
Mavis Maclean
back to top
|